![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
| Mailing Address: William E. Browne, Ph.D. Kewalo Marine Lab PBRC/University of Hawaii 41 Ahui St Honolulu, HI 96813 lab#808-539-7326 fax#808-599-4817 Email: wbrowne@hawaii.edu | |||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
Abstract of Thesis |
|||||||||||
![]() |
University of Chicago | ||||||||||
| The Embryonic Development of the Amphipod Crustacean Parhyale Hawaiensis
The paucity of developmental, genetic, and evolutionary data available in non-model systems leaves critical questions regarding the tempo and mode of evolution in generating extant biological diversity unanswered. These questions can begin to be addressed by 'gap-filling' with new systems more closely related to systems currently in use. The insect and crustacean lineages are thought to be closely allied. Crustaceans are an enormously successful group, possessing a wide diversity of morphologies and life histories. My dissertation focuses on developing a crustacean 'model system' to fill a critical taxonomic gap for the functional study of embryogenesis. I identified a crustacean species, Parhyale hawaiensis, suitable for laboratory culturing and embryonic analysis. Parhyale embryos are robust and resistant to environmental variations and thus are suitable for experimental manipulation. Parhyale embryos develop directly and hatchlings are morphologically similar to adults. I completed a etailed descriptive analysis of Parhyale embryogenesis, compiling data from in vivo description, nuclear DNA distribution, and two commonly used panspecific antibodies as molecular markers during segmentation and limb formation. Complete embryogenesis requires ~250hrs at 26 degrees Celcius. I divided embroygenesis into 30 stages. Significant to further studies, the early cleavage program is total and holoblastic and generates an eight-cell embryo. The staging data generated for Parhyale will facilitate comparative analysis of embryonic development among Crustacea as well as divergent arthropod groups such as Insecta, Myriapoda and Chelicerata. The eight-cell stage of Parhyale is amenable to microinjection techniques. Lineage tracing experiments identified specific and invariant lineages that map uniquely to these eight blastomeres. The early establishment of distinct cell lineages will facilitate experimental manipulations of cell lineage and germ layers via microinjection and other pertubation techniques. To explore the mechanism of 'pair-rule' patterning in segmentation, I cloned the Parhyale homolog of Drosophila hairy. In situ hybridization suggests a requirement for Ph hes in every segment. This is inconsistent with the two-segment periodicity patterning role of hairy in Drosophila. The Parhyale expression data suggests that 'pair-rule' patterning mechanisms may be restricted to the insect lineage. To assess the validity of this hypothesis requires analysis of hairy expression and other 'primary pair-rule' genes in additional arthropods. |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
NIPAM H. PATEL
|
|||||||||||
Areas of interest:
Education:1994 - 2003
1994
Research Experience:1999
1996
1995-96
1995
1994
1994 Sigma Xi Scientific Society 1993
1993-94
1990-94
Publications and presentations:2002
2000
1999
1999
1998
1997
1997
1996
1995
Research Interests:I am driven by the immense range of biological diversity and the relationship between phenotype and genotype. The correlation between genotypic and phenotypic variation is most beguiling. How is observed organismal diversity generated? What are the rules governing this connection between genotype and phenotype? And importantly, how are these rules interpreted by organisms passaging through evolutionary time? Further resolution of some of these major questions of both evolutionary process and history require a multidisciplinary experimental approach. My thesis research focuses on Hox gene expression, regulation, and function. Hox genes are members of the homeodomain family of transcription factors which regulate body plan development in a number of metazoan phyla. This process appears to be driven through regulation of specific cell fate and determination events. I have set out to test some proposed evolutionary aspects of Hox gene expression and correlated changes in cell fate and morphology in arthropods. Arthropods have a great diversity of body plans which are reflected in differential segment fates and thus are particularly well suited for comparative Hox gene expression analysis. Within arthropods it is crustaceans that demonstrate the greatest degrees of morphological divergence and differential segmental fates. These variable segment fates have been hypothesized to be under the control of Hox gene complex members. Previous comparative studies of Hox gene expression domains suggest that both radical and subtle changes in gene expression boundaries have correlated with changes in both body plans and segmental fates through evolutionary time. These observations raise an important question concerning diversity of metazoan body plans. Have changes in regulation of Hox gene expression played an important role in evolution of morphology? From early data it is clear that future studies must be extended to include both a wider range of related organisms and a wider range of Hox gene complex members. This is crucial in assessing the relative evolutionary importance of regulatory changes in Hox gene expression domains during embryonic development. Cloned Hox gene sequences are used for generating in situ probes which delineate endogenous gene transcript expression domains during embryogenesis. Cloned sequences are used to probe embryonic cDNA libraries for full length transcripts. These cDNAs will then be used for two purposes. One, insertion into misexpression vectors followed by injection into developing crustacean embryos. Resulting phenotypes will be examined and should provide support for the evolutionary inferences drawn from comparative analysis of endogenous expression domains. Perturbation experiments are predicted to produce changes in specific cell fates and thus shed light on morphogenetic transitions of segmental fates. Some of these morphogenetic transitions will be predicted based upon previous genetic studies in Drosophila involving both ectopic and mutant expression of Hox genes. However, by virtue of greater morphological divergence within crustaceans, novel fate transitions associated with novel expression domains may serve to illuminate additional Hox gene functions in cell fate decisions and segmental identity determination. |
|||||||||||